Sanctions in opposition to Russia will not be retroactive | A letter

Simon Jenkins (The ruble is rising and Putin is extra highly effective than ever – our sanctions backfired, 29 July) writes that sanctions “are supposed to intimidate folks into avoiding their leaders”. In all his sections he places these disciplines first, however he doesn’t say a phrase concerning the ethical side.

In the event you discover out that your good friend was partaking in severe immorality, you possibly can confront them about it, and in the event that they refuse, you possibly can resolve to cease. I doubt if anybody would assume that denying friendship will pressure them to vary; you do not need something to do with them. You not perform in an ethical universe.

I feel there are a lot of folks on this nation who would quite endure excessive oil costs than purchase Russian gasoline – on ethical grounds. Sure, the issue with ethical sanctions is that of demarcation; or Russia, then why not Saudi Arabia, China or Israel? That is typically a grey space, not least as a result of we within the “enlightened west” are removed from morally pure. However invading a neighboring nation, unprovoked, is as a lot a violation of worldwide legislation as you may get, and shouldn’t be condoned, at any price.
David Sutherland

Mr Jenkins’ article arguably misses the purpose. Though he rightly factors out that “financial cooperation, which has all the time been seen as an instrument of peace, has been was a weapon of struggle”, he misses the truth that the sanctions regime was imposed on Russia due to its invasion of Ukraine. it’s primarily geared toward breaking Russia’s involvement – perceived integration – on this planet economic system. Simply because the silly Angela Merkel believed that integrating Russia into the world economic system by importing its low-cost gasoline would scale back the menace, so now too many, Mr. Jenkins included, miss out on that the sanctions are literally eradicating Russia from the world economic system. “Low cost” energy from Russia has come at an enormous worth. However it’s higher to pay that worth now than to attend till Russia appears at Lithuania or Poland.
Scott Blau
Keighley, West Yorkshire

As I used to be studying Simon Jenkins’ piece on Russian sanctions, my spouse was crying over the 50 Ukrainian prisoners of struggle who had been killed within the Russian shelling of the Olenivka jail within the Donetsk area. Those that had been Azov servicemen, defended Mariupol.

Mr. Jenkins could also be proper concerning the financial price of sanctions, however this one-dimensional, gas-burning view misses one thing necessary. Sanctions will not be solely a device to revive the Russian economic system “again to the stone age”, however a method to present solidarity with the Ukrainian folks.

Canceling sanctions whereas persevering with the arms embargo? Come on, it is like treating a damaged limb with painkillers, however not utilizing any robust bandages. The state of affairs is turning into more and more painful and more and more troublesome to handle in Russia. These sanctions, mixed with Ukraine’s success on the battlefield, make Russia extra inclined in direction of peace talks. Right here, 400km from the entrance, we see Russia dropping face.

Since February 24, Ukrainians see the world in black and white. Whereas our individuals are dying from Russian weapons, there isn’t any room for “Sure, however…” We do not get it. We have now the best to disregard all these “buts”.

I wish to thank the UK for its assist and I pray that the battle ends with our victory.
Bohdan Kisil
Kyiv, Ukraine

Have an opinion on something you learn within the Guardian immediately? Please electronic mail us your letter and will probably be checked for publication.

About the author


Leave a Comment